<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>It looks like you are averaging over many states with different symmetry, but using equal weights for all states.  Have you tried playing with the weights?  Since you only need the orbitals, you shouldn't be bothered by the potentially thorny conceptual issues of interpretation that arise when the state-averaged ensemble is not evenly weighted...  Maybe start with a CAS-CI to figure out where your target state is, then do a CASSCF with a weighting scheme designed to target that state.  </div><div><br></div><div>Another, probably more straightforward, way to do this is to first do a CASSCF that is rigged to target only the state of interest (by heavily constricting the active space to only the few orbitals most involved).  Then, if that works, try to do the same with the other states of interest and use MERGE to construct an initial guess from the pre-optimized orbitals.  This may put the initial guess in a region where it is harder to kick the state in question out.  </div><div><br></div><div>-Seth</div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On 17/08/2012, at 10:06 AM, Terry Frankcombe wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>I have had similar experiences when trying to do specific things with<br>specific orbitals.  To me this suggests that the orbital you are<br>interested in does not "contribute" much correlation energy.  The<br>algorithm decides, rightly, that a lower energy results from rotating<br>your orbital of interest out of the space.<br><br>In a sense, this simply means that the optimisation algorithm in molpro<br>multi is "too good".  The solution I have has some success with is to<br>hamstring the optimisation algorithm; choose a known inferior one.  Try<br>something like:<br><br>ITERATIONS; DO AUGMENT 1 TO <whatever><br><br><br>On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 16:06 +0000, Little, Duncan wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Dear Molpro users,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">I am trying to generate orbitals using MULTI for use in a separate calculation. I have previously posted about this: <a href="http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/2012-July/004968.html">http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/2012-July/004968.html</a> (thank you for your responses) but now feel I have refined my problem. The problem I am experiencing is that an orbital that is needed for a particular (Rydberg) state in my separate calculation is constantly pushed above the active space orbitals every time I try to increase the active space to incorporate it. I use the same active space for the separate calculation as the MOLPRO one for generating the orbitals. For example: <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">31102110 CAS, the orbital I would like to be in the active space is highlighted by ****. It is the first virtual orbital after the active orbitals:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   angstrom<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   geometry={<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">N,, 0.0000000, 0.00000000, r,; N,, 0.0000000, 0.00000000, -r,;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">{rhf<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=1,spin=1;}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">{mcscf<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">config<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">CLOSED,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">occ,3,1,1,0,2,1,1,0;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=1,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=2,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=3,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=5,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=6,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=7,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">ORBPRINT,110}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> NATURAL ORBITALS                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> ================                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   Orb     Occ        Energy       Coefficients<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   1.5  2.00000   -16.127629     0.992816  0.000121  0.018420 -0.009890  0.005998  0.000584 -0.001178 -0.000138  0.002840 -0.002171<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            -0.000081  0.000261  0.000000 -0.000380  0.000000 -0.000908  0.000000  0.000344  0.000000 -0.000018<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000  0.000087  0.000000  0.000252  0.000000 -0.000067  0.000000  0.000000  0.000057  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   2.5  1.74152    -1.093616     0.007334  0.343864  0.283056  0.632141  0.353841 -0.036050  0.080350  0.155758  0.160042  0.002537<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.006503 -0.002890  0.000000 -0.006509  0.000000 -0.003557  0.000000  0.003376  0.000000  0.000340<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.000493  0.000000  0.000567  0.000000 -0.000049  0.000000  0.000000 -0.000722  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">****   3.5 -0.00000    -0.082578    -0.001345 -0.059745 -0.000497 -0.499029 -4.563792-10.178761 -0.007343 -0.022340  0.460257  2.317907<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            2.931892  0.004592  0.000000 -0.029487 -0.000000 -0.242067 -0.000000 -0.418116 -0.000000  0.000852<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000  0.028458  0.000000  0.036191  0.000000 -0.002525  0.000000  0.000000 -0.003243 -0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   4.5 -0.00000     0.064433    -0.014736 -0.110028 -0.261324  0.916306 13.950224 33.887139 -0.006373  0.010013 -1.576450 -7.800327<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -6.758397 -0.008343 -0.000000  0.122852  0.000000  0.860659  0.000000  1.388081  0.000000 -0.004092<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.000000 -0.100116 -0.000000 -0.092591 -0.000000  0.009613 -0.000000 -0.000000  0.005993  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   5.5 -0.00000     0.184409     0.007943 -0.020624 -0.010409  0.329126  9.566157  2.631699  0.034462  0.107873 -0.598887 -3.426771<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.612603  0.000287  0.000000  0.060834  0.000000  0.428530  0.000000  2.382657  0.000000 -0.001865<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.018177 -0.000000 -0.363481 -0.000000 -0.006317  0.000000 -0.000000  0.047744 -0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Separate calculation. Increasing the active space to 31103110, the orbital then moves to 4.5 (again highlighted by ****).  <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> {mcscf<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> config<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> CLOSED,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> occ,3,1,1,0,3,1,1,0;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=1,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=2,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=3,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=5,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=6,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> wf,charge=1,symmetry=7,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> ORBPRINT,110}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> NATURAL ORBITALS                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> ================                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   Orb     Occ        Energy       Coefficients<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   1.5  2.00000   -16.116798     0.992724  0.000033  0.018523 -0.009949  0.006088  0.000623 -0.001119 -0.000248  0.002746 -0.002229<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            -0.000087  0.000264  0.000000 -0.000318  0.000000 -0.000885  0.000000  0.000350  0.000000 -0.000025<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000  0.000058  0.000000  0.000251  0.000000 -0.000057  0.000000  0.000000  0.000066  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   2.5  1.72734    -1.087097     0.007619  0.344272  0.282977  0.634465  0.353815 -0.035906  0.080098  0.155189  0.159046  0.002279<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.006469 -0.002711  0.000000 -0.005941  0.000000 -0.002921  0.000000  0.003430  0.000000  0.000462<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.000255  0.000000  0.000588  0.000000 -0.000068  0.000000  0.000000 -0.000748  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   3.5  0.01910     0.678758    -0.045703 -0.347049 -0.397846 -0.973099 -0.704256 -0.193372  0.285598  0.660047  0.831059  0.300589<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.028733  0.014519  0.000000  0.009487  0.000000 -0.086907  0.000000 -0.030679  0.000000 -0.001631<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000  0.000472  0.000000  0.010586  0.000000 -0.001806  0.000000  0.000000  0.003928  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">****   4.5 -0.00000    -0.079708    -0.000612  0.038633 -0.019481  0.455560  4.697201 10.697348  0.022228  0.053456 -0.431397 -2.373266<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -3.050646 -0.003252  0.000000  0.036710  0.000000  0.267211  0.000000  0.458377  0.000000 -0.001136<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.030899 -0.000000 -0.039953 -0.000000  0.002579 -0.000000 -0.000000  0.003774  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Separate calculation. Increasing the active space to 31104110 (I am aware this may not be an ideal CAS but it is solely to illustrate my point), the orbital then moves to 4.5 (again highlighted by ****).  <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">{rhf<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=1,spin=1;}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">{mcscf<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">config<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">CLOSED,1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">occ,3,1,1,0,4,1,1,0;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=1,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=2,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=3,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=5,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=6,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">wf,charge=1,symmetry=7,spin=1;state,1;weight,1;<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">ORBPRINT,110}<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> NATURAL ORBITALS                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"> ================                                        <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   Orb     Occ        Energy       Coefficients<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   1.5  2.00000   -16.116631     0.992710  0.000036  0.018568 -0.009984  0.006086  0.000608 -0.001132 -0.000246  0.002772 -0.002235<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            -0.000085  0.000265  0.000000 -0.000325  0.000000 -0.000894  0.000000  0.000351  0.000000 -0.000024<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000  0.000060  0.000000  0.000254  0.000000 -0.000057  0.000000  0.000000  0.000066  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                             0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   2.5  1.72897    -1.087327     0.007169  0.341606  0.280128  0.623621  0.377514 -0.027605  0.079566  0.153830  0.158453  0.001259<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.005524 -0.002652  0.000000 -0.006146  0.000000 -0.003580  0.000000  0.003723  0.000000  0.000469<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.000277  0.000000  0.000759  0.000000 -0.000060  0.000000  0.000000 -0.000700  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   3.5  0.01915     0.692432    -0.040626 -0.321662 -0.357695 -0.917013 -0.889834 -0.209679  0.295834  0.683983  0.808532  0.322875<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.030401  0.016586  0.000000  0.010275  0.000000 -0.087661  0.000000 -0.035449  0.000000 -0.000774<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000  0.002678  0.000000  0.009216  0.000000 -0.002156  0.000000  0.000000  0.003225  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">   4.5  0.00307     0.796155    -0.083489 -0.513488 -1.211317  0.066232  3.073560  0.258293 -0.118911 -0.311993  0.001787 -0.556182<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.029572 -0.017016  0.000000 -0.025841  0.000000  0.009608  0.000000  0.086108  0.000000 -0.006459<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000 -0.014354  0.000000  0.019845  0.000000  0.003748  0.000000  0.000000  0.003494  0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">*****   5.5 -0.00000    -0.042134     0.008871  0.032148  0.127032 -0.475218 -7.748323-19.960582  0.005297  0.000261  0.835343  3.953541<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                            4.903763  0.005937 -0.000000 -0.058749 -0.000000 -0.432178 -0.000000 -0.718211 -0.000000  0.002261<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.000000  0.052030  0.000000  0.061429  0.000000 -0.004754  0.000000  0.000000 -0.005687 -0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">                                           -0.000000<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Does any one have any idea what may be causing this or what it is indicative of? I've tried a variety of orbital restrictions, increasing the CAS in other symmetries but the orbital constantly jumps up in everything I do.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Any suggestions would be much appreciated.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Duncan Little<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">University College London<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Molpro-user mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="mailto:Molpro-user@molpro.net">Molpro-user@molpro.net</a><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><a href="http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user">http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user</a><br></blockquote><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Molpro-user mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Molpro-user@molpro.net">Molpro-user@molpro.net</a><br>http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">---------------------------------------------------<br>Seth Olsen<br>ARC Australian Research Fellow<br>6-431 Physics Annexe<br>School of Mathematics and Physics<br>The University of Queensland<br>Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia<br><a href="mailto:seth.olsen@uq.edu.au">seth.olsen@uq.edu.au</a></div><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">+61 7 3365 2816<br>---------------------------------------------------<br>Unless stated otherwise, this e-mail represents only the views of the Sender and not the views of The University of Queensland</div></span></div></span></span>
</div>
<br></body></html>