Z Matrix/ orientation questions - different results G98 vs MOLPRO
Matt Hodges
matt at stchem.bham.ac.uk
Sat Dec 6 09:29:27 GMT 2003
>>>>> Jim Kress writes:
> I have a 3 atom molecule. The z-matrix specification is:
> Si
> Si,1,R2
> Si,1,R3,2,A3
> R2=2.2110264
> R3=2.21099361
> A3=120.00000169
[...]
> In MOLPRO 2002.6 (using nosym and nooreint to force no
> reorientation) the identical z-matrix yields the following
> Cartesian coordinates:
> ATOMIC COORDINATES
>
> NR ATOM CHARGE X Y Z
>
> 1 SI 4.00 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
> 2 SI 4.00 0.000000000 0.000000000 4.178234050
> 3 SI 4.00 0.000000000 3.618403106 -2.089086149
[...]
> How do I get MOLPRO to generate the same Cartesian coordinates as
> G98W? I tried planexz with no success.
One way to achieve this is to use a dummy atom in the geometry
specification:
geometry={noorient
Si
Si,1,R2
X,1,R3,2,A3
Si,1,R3,2,A3,3,-90}
--
Dr. Matt Hodges
School of Chemistry
University of Birmingham
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list