No binding of Pt2!
Li, Jun
Jun.Li at pnl.gov
Mon Jan 19 23:52:42 GMT 2004
> Hi, Joris
>
> I don't know if your problem gets solved. I am just offering a few
> suggestions for you to consider:
>
> (1) ECP60MWB should be better than ECP60MHF for Pt
> (2) f-polarization and diffuse functions are very important for these
> Au-neighbors, so usually people use 3f2g set for augmenting the basis
> sets
> (3) With ECPs for heavy metals, you might want to very carefully check
> your orbitals to see if the calculation is converged to the real
> ground state you wanted to.
> Good luck!
>
> Jun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/attachments/20040119/bad70eb2/attachment.html>
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list