[molpro-user] Problem with ZnCl2
Muller, Richard
rmuller at sandia.gov
Sun Nov 14 19:33:35 GMT 2004
I'm having a problem computing geometries of ZnCl2. I certainly could
be doing something wrong, because although I've used molpro quite a
bit, this is the first time I've used either the Hay/Wadt ECP, or the
B3LYP DFT functionalities.
Here's the jist of the problem: both Jaguar and GAMESS/US give a linear
geometry for ZnCl2, but molpro gives a bent geometry. To make sure I
didn't do something dumb in the optimization, I attach here a geometry
scan using a fixed Zn-Cl bond length (2.165 \AA) and angles from 90-180
degrees. I compare (left to right) Jaguar using the LACVP basis/ECP,
Gamess using the 6-31G** basis set, Gamess using the Hay/Wadt ECP, and
Molpro using the LANL2DZ (which I think is essentially the same basis
set/ECP as the Gamess Hay/Wadt). All programs use the B3LYP functional:
Ang Jag/LACVP GMS/6-31G** GMS/HW MP/LANL2DZ
90 -986.0182 -2699.2983 -95.4352 -95.1170
100 -986.0356 -2699.3169 -95.4529 -95.0963
110 -986.0478 -2699.3302 -95.4654 -95.0812
120 -986.0575 -2699.3405 -95.4748 -95.0706
130 -986.0650 -2699.3485 -95.4820 -95.0584
140 -986.0704 -2699.3544 -95.4874 -95.0548
150 -986.0746 -2699.3585 -95.4913 -95.0524
160 -986.0776 -2699.3609 -95.4939 -95.0509
170 -986.0791 -2699.3621 -95.4953 -89.0280
180 -986.0794 -95.4958
(this will probably only look good in a fixed-width font).
Am I doing something dumb here? Here's an example of the input file I'm
using:
***,ZnCl2
basis=LANL2DZ
geometry={,
ANGSTROM
Zn
Cl1, Zn, 2.165
Cl2, Zn, 2.165, Cl1 170
}
ks,b3lyp
I'd like to augment these calculations with some CC calculations, but I
wanted to figure out what I'm doing wrong first. Thanks in advance for
any help anyone can answer.
Rick Muller
rmuller at sandia.gov
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list