[molpro-user] EOM-CCSD second moments
Joseph Lane
jlane at alkali.otago.ac.nz
Thu May 17 15:17:59 BST 2007
I am having some difficulty understanding the one-electron properties
calculated with EOM-CCSD in molpro as compared to the CCSD linear response
in Dalton. I realise that the EOM-CCSD properties are calculated as
expectation and the linear response as energy derivatives, hence there
should be small numeric differences between the two.
For ground state calculations, the dipole moments and quadrupole moments
calculated with both methods are the same, however the second moments are
different.
Molpro:
!CCSD_nonrel dipole moment : 0.00000000 0.00000000
-0.64447126
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|QMXX|1.1> 2.937794363335
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|QMYY|1.1> -3.662513450822
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|QMZZ|1.1> 0.724719087487
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|QMRR|1.1> -53.392633597836
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|XX|1.1> -15.839014957055
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|YY|1.1> -20.239220166494
!CCSD(NOREL) expec <1.1|ZZ|1.1> -17.314398474288
Dalton:
Total Molecular Dipole Moment
au Debye
z -0.64448139 -1.63810812
Total Molecular quadrupole moment
X Y Z
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
1 2.93725559 0.00000000 0.00000000
2 0.00000000 -3.66309263 0.00000000
3 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.72583703
Electronic second moment of charge
X Y Z
1 15.83901789 0.00000000 0.00000000
2 0.00000000 107.37034240 0.00000000
3 0.00000000 0.00000000 32.24924174
For excited state calculations, the dipole moments are again the same with
both codes but the quadrupole and second moments are completely different.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
Joseph Lane
Department of Chemistry
University of Otago
P.O. Box 56
Dunedin, New Zealand
ph +64 3 479 5378
email : jlane at alkali.otago.ac.nz
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list