[molpro-user] two questions: freq for CASSCF and gradients for QCISD(T)
eurisco1 at pochta.ru
eurisco1 at pochta.ru
Sun Nov 22 12:14:09 GMT 2009
Dear Molpro Users and Developers,
Would you allow me to address to you
necessary questions:
I have calculated frequencies
(numerically) as well as analytically by using routes on Version
2008.1 linked 05 Sep 2008 (trial) at the level CAS(10,10)/cc-pVDZ
First input:
geomtyp=xyz
geometry={
6
my molecule _xyz
}
basis=VdZ
{hf;wf,46,1,0,0}
{multi;occ,28;closed,18;wf,46,1,0,0;cpmcscf,hess}
{frequencies} !do
---
Second input:
geomtyp=xyz
geometry={
6
my molecule _xyz
}
basis=VdZ
{hf;wf,46,1,0,0}
{multi;occ,28;closed,18;wf,46,1,0,0}
{frequencies;
print,low,img;} !do
and I have always observed only real
frequencies (which were slightly different). But if I used Gaussian
(both 03 and 09) to calculate (numerically) frequencies I observed
only one imag. (~100i) frequency (I performed IRC and achieved both
valleys).
Why I got two different results? How
can I treat this situation?
In the Molpro manual states that
analytical gradients are available
for qcisd(t). I have tested simple input
! $Revision: 2008.1
***,h2o !A title
memory,150,m
r=2.5,theta=120
geometry={o;
h1,O,r;
h2,O,r,H1,theta
}
basis=vdz
rhf
rqcisd(t)
optg
but I have observed only messages about
numerical calculations of gradients
Numerical gradient completed.
CPU-time: 0.75 sec, Elapsed: 2.50 sec
What is wrong in my input? Are
analytical gradients available for geometry optimizations if qcisd(t)
method is used for calculation of energy?
Sincerely,
PhD student Oleg B. Gadzhiev
ps: I have downloaded molpro 5 days
ago.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/attachments/20091122/8ee019f7/attachment.html>
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list