[molpro-user] Regarding usage of effective core potentials for fluorine atom
Kirk Peterson
kipeters at wsu.edu
Tue Jan 4 06:56:04 GMT 2011
Aleem,
It's difficult to see where the problem lies without the full inputs. Your ECP input looks ok. Note that your F basis should probably be used uncontracted since it's contraction coeffs are optimized for all-electron calculations.
-Kirk
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 3, 2011, at 9:54 PM, syed aleem <aleem3176 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> I am trying to use relativistic effective core potential for core electrons of Fluorine atom in ch3f molecule
>
> My input according to manual is
>
> ***,ionization potential
> memory,100,m
> basis={h=aug-cc-pvtz,
> c=aug-cc-pvtz,
> f=aug-cc-pvqz
> ECP,F,2,3,0;
> 1; 2,1.000000,0.000000;
> 1; 2,16.762800,96.241900;
> 1; 2,19.857600,-4.581900;
> 1; 2,0.031600,-0.001500;}
> geomtyp=xyz
> geometry={5
> geometry parameters,wave function for multi and mrci calculation were followed
>
> But the problem is when I submitted this job. state energies were drastically changed. I am providing both outputs (one with ecp and one without)
>
> With ECP
>
> MRCI MRCI MULTI MULTI RHF-SCF
> -64.08157998 -64.10092216 -63.67925159 -63.69710084 -63.49847009
>
> With out ECP
>
> MRCI MRCI MULTI MULTI RHF-SCF
> -138.93548516 -139.06809598 -138.57347287 -138.70164845 -139.10421155
>
> Could you please check whether there was any mistake in my input. I would be grateful if you explain how to deal with ECP (effective core potentials in molpro calculations)
>
> Thanking you in advance for your help
>
> Regards,
>
> Aleem,
> School of Chemistry,
> University of Hyderabad,
> INDIA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Molpro-user mailing list
> Molpro-user at molpro.net
> http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/attachments/20110103/355f21df/attachment.html>
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list