[molpro-user] Starting point is not a critical point
Gabriel Freitas
gabrielnfreitas at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 13:55:23 GMT 2012
Dear professor Werner and colleagues,
I see the point, but it's not the case.
I have converged the geometry and calculated the frequencies both using
symmetry (in which I froze the dihedral coordinate - my molecule has 4
atoms, and this particular isomer is planar) or not, and normal modes
confirm that I have a TS (no warning message regarding gradient
norms). It's true that when it's optimized without symmetry, the dihedral
plane is not exactly zero (the value when symmetry is on), but it's lower
than 1 degree, and frequencies are essentially the same.
Regards,
Gabriel
2012/1/9 Hans-Joachim Werner <werner at theochem.uni-stuttgart.de>
> This can happen if you optimize the transition state in a limited
> parameter space.
> The IRC optimization requires a full optimization (3N-6 coordinates).
> Please check
> if that is the case!
> Best regards
> Joachim Werner
> Am 08.01.2012 um 16:30 schrieb Gabriel Freitas:
>
> Dear molpro users/developers,
>
> I'm trying to do an IRC calculation from a transition state previously
> calculated. But by the time the qsdpath takes its first step, I get the
> message:
>
> *QSDPATH2: Starting point is not a critical point.*
>
> I've tried many things, but unsuccessfully, and I'm afraid there can be a
> bug in the code.
>
> Here follows one example, in which I reoptmize the TS (which converges in
> a single step, since the starting geometry is already converged) and ask
> for IRC using the hessian calculated during the TS search.
>
>
> Part of the input
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXX
> nosym
> R1=1.34210982 ang,
> R2=1.76235720 ang,
> R3=1.30142476 ang,
> a=92.77261716 degree,
> b=113.97606866 degree,
> g=0.00000 degree
> geometry={ }
> rhf,maxdis=50,maxit=100;
> rccsd(t),maxit=70;
> {optg,root=2,method=qsd,maxit=100,saveact=...,rewind;print,history}
>
> {optg,method=qsdpath,hessrec=5300.2,dir=+3,numhess=0,hesscentral,maxit=100;print,history}
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> *Part of the output*
>
> XXXXXXXXX
>
> PROGRAM * OPT (Geometry optimization) Authors: F. Eckert and H.-J.
> Werner
>
> Geometry optimization using default procedure for command RCCSD(T)
>
> Numerically approximating hessian using central energy differences
>
> Task list generated. Total number of displacements: 42
>
> ....
>
> Numerical RCCSD(T) hessian completed. CPU-time: 31364.93 sec, Elapsed:
> 33653.29 sec
>
> RCCSD(T) hessian saved to record 5300.2
>
> Combined Powell-Murtagh-Sargent Update of Hessian
>
> Quadratic Steepest Descent - Transition State Search
>
> Optimization point 1
>
> Variable Last Current Next
> Gradient Hessian
>
> E(RCCSD(T)) / Hartree 0.00000000 -548.43957924 0.00000000
> R1 / ANG 0.00000000 1.34210982 1.34215444
> -0.00004976 0.97545936
> R2 / ANG 0.00000000 1.76235720 1.76307008
> -0.00025977 0.46872502
> A / DEGREE 0.00000000 92.77261716 92.75401930
> 0.00000022 0.00006113
> R3 / ANG 0.00000000 1.30142476 1.30118943
> 0.00017736 1.53165483
> B / DEGREE 0.00000000 113.97606866 113.97094779
> 0.00000020 0.00009433
> G / DEGREE 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.06878260
> 0.00000000 0.00000090
> Convergence: 0.00000000 (line search) 0.00189055
> 0.00016936 (total)
>
> END OF GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION. TOTAL CPU: 31240.2 SEC
>
>
> PROGRAM * OPT (Geometry optimization) Authors: F. Eckert and H.-J.
> Werner
>
>
> Geometry optimization using default procedure for command RCCSD(T)
>
>
> Number of displacements for numerical gradient: 12
>
> Starting numerical gradient for RCCSD(T)
>
> Numerical gradient completed. CPU-time: 8776.29 sec, Elapsed: 9365.30
> sec
>
> RCCSD(T) hessian read from record 5300.2
>
> Combined Powell-Murtagh-Sargent Update of Hessian
>
> Quadratic Steepest Descent - Reaction Path Following using updated
> Hessian
>
> Hessian eigenvalues: 0.002870 0.102644 0.198864 0.270747 0.292713
> 0.478791
>
> QSDPATH2: Starting point is not a critical point.
> Performing a regular QSD step. Stepsize = 0.075068 Curvature =
> .49831D+04
>
> Optimization point 1
>
> Variable Last Current Next
> Gradient Hessian
>
> E(RCCSD(T)) / Hartree 0.00000000 -548.43957912 0.00000000
> R1 / ANG 0.00000000 1.34215444 1.34215192
> -0.00000415 0.97545936
> R2 / ANG 0.00000000 1.76307008 1.76311166
> -0.00002081 0.46872502
> A / DEGREE 0.00000000 92.75401930 92.75259887
> 0.00000000 0.00006113
> R3 / ANG 0.00000000 1.30118943 1.30117610
> 0.00000355 1.53165483
> B / DEGREE 0.00000000 113.97094779 113.97050327
> -0.00000001 0.00009433
> G / DEGREE 0.00000000 -0.06878260 -0.14458311
> 0.00000007 0.00000090
> Convergence: 1.00000000 (line search) 0.00132580
> 0.00001209 (total)
>
> XXXXX
>
> Although the hessian is calculated for a geometry slightly displaced from
> the one used for the gradient calculation, it can be seen that both
> gradients are smaller than the default converge threshold,
>
> Any help would be very appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Gabriel do Nascimento Freitas
> D.Sc. Student - Graduate Program of Chemistry
> Molecular Modelling and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory - Room 412
> Chemistry Institute - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) -
> Brazil
> (+5521)8830-9971 / (+5521)2562-7179
> _______________________________________________
> Molpro-user mailing list
> Molpro-user at molpro.net
> http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.molpro.net/pipermail/molpro-user/attachments/20120109/d09295d9/attachment.html>
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list