[molpro-user] selection of CAS
A.Zech at stud.uni-heidelberg.de
A.Zech at stud.uni-heidelberg.de
Thu Sep 5 10:03:37 BST 2013
Thanks for your reply. I'm fairly new to Molpro so please excuse if i
missed an obvious solution to this problem.
Yes, i do know which orbitals to swap (6.2 and 7.2, respectively).
Including the 6.2 orbital into CAS (i.e. 1.2 to 6.2) results in a
lower energy than moving that orbital out of the active space (i.e.
CAS(6,6) = 1.2 to 5.2, plus 7.2).Thus the orbital in question always
gets rotated back during wavefunction optimization. With a slightly
distorted geometry (Cs, one angle changed by 0.001 degrees), i tried
the DONT directive to turn off the optimization, but i only get as
close as 0.1eV to the corresponding energy in C2v. I'm convinced that
the ROTATE directive is the best strategy here. Is there a way to keep
the CAS orbital selection (after ROTATE) constant during the
wavefunction optimization?
Best regards,
Alexander Zech
--------------------------------------------------------
Provided you know which orbitals you want to move in/out of the active
space, this can be achieved with the ROTATE directive - see
http://www.molpro.net/info/2012.1/doc/manual/node240.html
Peter
On 23 Aug 2013, at 14:38, A.Zech at stud.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> i would like to exclude a single orbital from a certain CAS. In my
> case i used
> the following B1 and A2 orbitals (molecule has C2v symmetry, lies in
> yz-plane):
> 1.2
> 2.2
> 3.2
> 4.2
> ---
> 1.4
> 2.4
> For some normal modes the symmetry gets reduced to Cs. My problem
> now is that i can't use the same CAS anymore since the order of
> orbitals gets mixed up.
> The order in A'' is then:
> 1.2 [former 1.2]
> 2.2 [former 1.4]
> 3.2 [former 2.2]
> 4.2 [former 2.4]
> 5.2 [former 3.2]
> 6.2 [former 3.4]*
> 7.2 [former 4.2]
> Following the molpro syntax for OCC and CLOSED, it's not possible to
> get the same CAS without including 6.2 [formerly 3.4], which i
> marked with an asterisk.
> Is there any possibility to exclude that orbital from the active
> space, maybe with the ORBITAL directive?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alexander Zech
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Molpro-user mailing list
> Molpro-user at molpro.net
> http://www.molpro.net/mailman/listinfo/molpro-user
--
Prof. Peter J. Knowles
School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place,
Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
Telephone +44 29 208 79182 Email KnowlesPJ at Cardiff.ac.uk
WWW
http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/chemy/contactsandpeople/academicstaff/knowles.html
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list