[molpro-user] P86 functional difference between Molpro and Gaussian09
Susi Lehtola
susi.lehtola at alumni.helsinki.fi
Sat Oct 4 21:23:43 BST 2014
On 10/03/2014 04:22 PM, Jason Goodpaster wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to determine what is the difference between P86 in Molpro
> and Gaussian09. On a simple Ne atom in the 6-31g basis for B88 ONLY I
> have,
>
> Molpro: -128.496410793009
> Gassian09: -128.496410693
FWIW, I ran this with my code that uses libxc to evaluate the functionals
ERKALE: -128.49641120
as well as Q-Chem
Q-Chem: -128.4964105792
so a very small difference, less than 1 uHa.
> Therefore B88 is the same. But, for BP86 in both codes I get
>
> Molpro: -128.894112927843
> Gaussian09: -128.887877179
ERKALE: -128.88777766
Q-Chem: -128.8878692238
> Anyone know why?
Maybe there's a bug in the Molpro implementation?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Susi Lehtola, PhD Chemist Postdoctoral Fellow
susi.lehtola at alumni.helsinki.fi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
http://www.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol USA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Molpro-user
mailing list